I have no problem with that and you do the job admirably, yet subzero offers nothing but insults and slurs. He could have actually responded to the substance of Peter's post but instead chose to sneer at Peter's important observation that the tester previously worked for Intel. As regards Anand changing tests well if they had stood up to any sort of scrutiny they would not have needed to be changed. As it happens I think the Infoworld's tests are probably valid in the context of Intel-friendly multi-tasking work. Any credit due to Intel for their hyperthreading work should be duly given, render unto Caesar what is Caesar's :-). I just want to know the truth without all these childish peurile fanboy insults obscuring the issues. Is that too much to ask in an adult forum ? :-(
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
