Leo, I've read most of your post. I believe that most want clarity ... by insinuating that the last PR was what shareholders should have expected is with all due respect off target.
I can say this with surety, most shareholders have posted that the PR was NOT what was expected ... “household name, nationally recognized” statements were let loose on our community. I expected a USA firm and I expected a cash offering and no RM type deal.
The positive points from the PR were the statement concerning the “Third Party”. I only hope that the Third Party statement has more validity than the “household name, nationally recognized” innuendos.
All imo.