Thanks very much for the explanation.
I read through all of the discussion of the debenture in the the filing, trying to understand how many shares could potentially be added to the current 10+ million shares outstanding, if the debentures were converted, thinking that is why they had to show the fully diluted earnings as a much smaller amount. But by that reasoning, cutting the EPS in about half (from 0.86 to 0.44) implied that the outstanding shares would roughly double if the debentures were converted.
Based on your answer, I now understand that they are withholding a sum of money from the net income (roughly 4-5 million $US) to calculate the fully diluted EPS, rather than adjusting the shares outstanding. But just to be clear, at what point in time can they stop doing that on their income statement, and show the basic income as the fully diluted income? Is it when the debentures become due?
I fully appreciate and agree with your point that the main concern for us as shareholders is the PPS, but coming at it from the standpoint of potential investors evaluating the company and buying in, obviously the higher the EPS, the better chance of getting the PPS to go higher as well. Of course, if these potential investors do their due diligence, and go beyond just looking at the diluted EPS and P/E, then they would understand that the company is earning a lot more money than superficially meets the eye.
Thanks also, long, for the analysis of the effect of uplisting, and the discussion of the moving averages. It looks like the patience of the long-term "strong buy" crowd is finally beginning to be rewarded.
Regards,
Eric