What news would that be? we have nothing but "promising potential sales oppertuniites" PR's with no numbers, the current PPS is based on the "buyout" and the ONE 12m contract, we have been told that the expected sales for 09 are going to be in excess of 130mil to get to that number will take another 10 of those 12mil contracts, here we are almost half way through the year and we have a PR that tells us about the 12mil contract that by Hos' own admition from the last CC I listened to only test kits have been shipped, not container loads of product which is what it will take to ship that value of product, and one PR telling us about the huge oppertunities that will come by selling product to one privatly owned fast food franchise outlet.
As I said in an ealier post all the PPS needs is some sales numbers.
I am also fed up with all the frigging experts here that claim " i have seen this many times in pink land" or "thank you for the PPS going down", or (and this is a classic) " I have just added to my position" WHAT ???? if those investors that have been around since the begining of time thought that this was a great company back in the day could have should have bought at one tenth of a fraction of what the PPS is today give me a break people, if only half of those that claim they "added today" did that then there would be no more shares to be bought.
Half of the A/S has been traded in the past month, so I have to conclude by this fact alone that either most of the posters on this board have alusions of grandure and wanna be big shots or most of the posters on this board own less than 100,000 shares.
The CC needs to tell us that the sales year to date are XXXX and that number needs to be in the mid 8 figure range, if not then the PPS will be back to TZ's by the end of this month. Then all the wanna be big shots can "load up" "back up the truck" "buckle up" "to the moon" yeah you have all seen these dumb posts here and just about every stock.
I invested in this stock to make money and there is nothing shameless in protesting about an employee not doing their job properly, after all that is what Hos' is right?, not a majority shareholder an employee.
NUMBERS NUMBERS NUMBERS it is a business, the owners of the company (common stock share holders) are entiltled to that, and not to be hood winked with fluff feeble PR's
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
