The onus is on the entity that is trying
to part you from your coin, to prove this information is true. They are the ones making the claim(s).
What's hidden is suspect, and nearly everything, save a bottle of all purpose-cleaner to a local fast food O/A, is hidden.
One cannot prove a negative, since this verifiable information is hidden. In a case such as this, the only reliable methodology is to look at the people involved, and draw other inferences from similar companies, who've made similar claims and see how it unfolded in those cases.
Most are not trading anymore, some have gone on with a new CIK, and in their wake are, ahem, legions of bagholders.
That's just reality though!
I have asked for folks to PM with any negative information, I have received nothing except more baseless accusations. Nobody has proven these contracts to be false