Like I said you caterwauling about those poor dealers when you wanted them to go through a regular bankruptcy and rest assured even more would have been shed because fiat needs the distribution channel in the US - your abject stupidity is that you think it would be better when it would be far worse. I believe we have given Chrysler something already and that we are not taking over their retirement yet. Oh and as for your wet dream of Toyota or Honda - maybe you can point to where everyone was fighting to get a piece of Chrysler I must have missed it. Remember if the bankruptcy is accepted there is I believe another round waiting for them.
The problem as with most of your posts is you like to scream with no solutions.
You make the inane statement that we don't know what would happen - Ya we do - Chrysler would be gone and picked clean while we (read taxpayers) would then hold their retirement and those workers would be gone. The inventory would be sold off and the plants would remain idle. Maybe just maybe someone would come in and grab some of their trucks but it would be small chump change.
So by your posts we also know you have as you would say - no freaking clue what the hell is going on. But please keep on trying to convince us you know something it's humorous.
jbog to SoxFan: "How do you know what would have happened if Chrysler would have gone through a normal bankruptcy. Would Toyota or Honda maybe bought it? Who knows."
In that article there's a statement that goes like this.... "If A.I.G. had spiraled into bankruptcy, its employees would have had to get in line with other unsecured creditors."
My, my. Why not let AIG do what you suggested of Chrysler? If AIG couldn't pay out those big bonuses because they didn't get the bailout money, they could start all over....and get rid of the thieves at the same time.
>"I get a chuckle out of jerks like you. How do you know what would have happened if Chrysler would have gone through a normal bankruptcy. Would Toyota or Honda maybe bought it? Who knows."<
Of course he doesn't, what we do likely know is that the UAW would be gone from the remnants of Chrysler. Funny people spent 8 years harping about Bush circumventing the Constitution yet seem pleased at Obama's complete disregard for the rule of law. (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124217356836613091.html) We need to keep in mind that Obama and the Dems. owes a debt to the UAW and we have a midterm election coming up. With the UAW as the majority owner at Chrysler all he has done is kick the can down the road as they will likely finish the company off IMO.
You need to keep in mind the cognitive ability of some posters. Some can only think in simple one dimension with dots and lines or good/bad as they believe that "Liberal" is anything they believe is right or true and "Conservative" is a bunch of religious fanatics who are pro-life and drink snake blood at church.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
