InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Sputnik

05/01/09 4:37 PM

#45994 RE: kelseyf #45992

kels, I am going by the "transparency and cold turkey discussion" provided by KA in his shareholder update. So do you have any info that confirms your contention that there are ongoing costs associated with the 2007 flood not covered by the previously spent $1,500,000 and those costs are embedded in the 2008 shareholder update? Is the only way to get this info to make a trip to Fort Worth and have a meeting with KA to get all of the Hemi info.? You know that you are implying that only those few shareholders and not all shareholders are in possession of potential inside info that the company is keeping close to the vest. kels, I think KA laid out for all to see pretty simply with no slight of hand.

Posted by: kelseyf Date: Monday, March 02, 2009 7:52:57 PM
In reply to: None Post # of 45992 [Send a link via email]
So all you guys that wanted some transparency, disclosure and cold turkey talking by Hemi.

IMO, Keith just delivered.


When ever you're ready lets debate the info. But lets also take a walk down memory lane on some of the recent posts for good measure.
http://www.hemienergy.com/final%20shareholder.doc

Kels