InvestorsHub Logo

PaperProphet

04/29/09 10:51 AM

#5854 RE: fsmith1952 #5853

Sure. Why not.

Another question might be to ask, since Mr. Curtis already had controlling interest and undoubtedly a substantial majority of the common...why he felt the need to rachet his ownership back up to near the top.

Joe Glusic owned about four million and we can certainly assume that Chad Curtis owned a substantion portion of the 15 million remaining outstanding shares before he introduced a new slug of about 30 million shares this past November.

There are only two rational explanations for that new slug of shares added this past November--either he's super-greedy and wanted to deny other shareholders as much as possible or he needed more shares to pump and dump. Either way, it's not a shining endorsement of Mr. Curtis' character. He's not in this for adding value--he's in it to swindle investors. Getting one or two tire-chipping machine up and running in a year's seems unworthy of any bonus but I suppose it's all relative--and highly dependent on who can serve his own self-interests better.