Replies to post #29736 on A.I.M. Users Bulletin Board (AIMUSERS)

[The Grabber]

Re: AIM II

I feel like I've stirred the pot a little (sorry, didn't mean to).

No problem. We've always had a lot of Sous Chefs in this kitchen!

Of course we would like to be your taste (beta) testers.

[ls7550]

Hi Ryan and welcome.

Hope you have greater luck with your devine inspiration that me.

I've had many such a moment with dreams of



only to end up with

http://www.aim-users.com/diction.htm#q15

(see - we've even got a name for such errors, so you wouldn't be the first).

The devil has a way of throwing a bug into the works. More usually for me that bug is of an Excel nature - the beast that it is.

If the Stewie plaque were made of gold then the number I would have won by now at present gold prices would have been enough to buy me one of them-there boats.

Nowadays I'm much more sceptical and when my (or others) test results look exceptionally good I instinctively consider them to be too-good-to-be-true.

Here's hoping you prove that instinct to be wrong.

Regards. Clive.

[lostcowboy]

Hi Ryan, sorry for the late response but how can you come up with $951,184 after 4 cycles, unless you are using margin and selling the stock short?

Even though Mr Lichello came up with attention grabbing titles for his books, the formula's try to reduce risk. one of the ways was to not use margin or sell stock short. In AIM you start with a 50%:50% ratio, and with Synchrovest and Twinvest you started with a 75%:25% ratio for the monthly investments.