First, looking into the company (through several sources), this company's legit. I've done my DD (learning from HGLC). Second, this company's seamless. It's identified a problem, went public with it and kept the issue above board AND had responded to the Shareholder's concerns. Last, I've turned the information over to my friend and ATTY, who informs me there's no "out clause" with the buyout arrangement. He's even bought into the company and voted himself and did some more behind the scenes legal DD for me (and him) and found all is well in order, even with the bump in the road.
Personally, I like the way this company does business with its shareholders. In my mind, it is "delivering" on their messages AND by the way of things (much different than HGLC), its gone far and above the .0001 AND they aren't selling shares behind the scenes and below par to puff up their share numbers on pinksheets.com (which we know does attract newbees).
With that, you seam like an old pro at this...why wouldn't you see it differently? HGLC isn't even in the same ballpark. And now that they're exposed, they haven't responded to the shareholders since......when? Even though many shareholders have asked??????
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
