Replies to post #12851 on 141 Capital Inc (fka ONCP)

[MuchCompensation]

Uhh Ok back at you.

UHHHH...Ok...1) In my world, "expert in pinks" is an oxymoron. 2)Yes it could easily "reap" millions if you recycle the shares 4 to 5 times before the Reverse Split! 3) The third "little piggie" is Ms. Rains of course, no scam artist ever strays to far from his or her accountant (or as they put it, TREASURER, it sounds so official!).....so look friend, the only reason i came over to this board is by accident. and i recognized one of the "pumpers" here from 2 other train wrecks. now honestly, if your in this POS on the ground floor, you will do ok ONE TIME! after that, its crash and burn, and all those innocent newbies to the market will hold back their cash from legitimate companies i enjoy investing in, so i just thought i would try to save some skin for the "virgin" investors listening to the chit-chat. also, it is absolutely ridiculous that the ibox ranks 141 as the #1 fund manager while only having 14,772 dollars in the fund!...red flags my friend!

Ms. Rains hasn't been around for a while, perhaps I should actually look at my IBOX, but that's never been my thing.

The so called "pumpers" you refer to is off topic, and any further mention shall be treated according to IHUB policy.

Also if you feel that a three month return of 45.17% is inferior, then I would humbly request your guidance in finding another company who could reproduce the same results.

On the other side, there are legitimate concerns with this company, and the amount of the trading pool although your figure doesn't reflect March's results is still a concern.

I also would suspect you aren't aware that the vast majority, if not all here are completely aware of those issues you bring to the table which you consider "new".

You are welcome to post here, just don't bring baggage from other boards here, and if you have a dispute with a particular poster, take it to the parking lot, and not here.

MC

One more thing, a "pinksheet expert" may or may not be an oxymoron, I suppose it depends on the opinions of people who understand the manipulative process or not.