InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

tryoty

03/22/09 2:45 PM

#155863 RE: MichiganNative #155857

MN, my only objection is using 136M barrels as a volume estimate. It's expressed in barrels and meant to quantify risk, but it is not meant as a measure of volume.

Compare it to this: I put 70 lbs of air in my bike tires, but they don't end up weighing 70 lbs. Pounds is a measure of pressure in this case, not a measure of weight.

When reading fully risked numbers, you are reading a measure of risk, not a volume estimate.

I hope that clarifies things. I have enjoyed spp's comments brought here from the EEL board for years. I just take issue with the above use of the recently released numbers.
icon url

walldog0

03/22/09 5:33 PM

#155880 RE: MichiganNative #155857

I thought for sure, that he had a run on...

sentence, and quite possibly forgot a comma or two!....hmmmm, but what do I know?
........:-)