Replies to post #15927 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[SlopsterSlasher]

Easyman51, well said, I think Tony is doing it right. There's more to marking this product than most think.The programming is critical.It MUST BE USER FRIENDLEY and meet the parameters required.There are many variables to look at,including the stepping on of toes.That may invite {later on down the road} legal ramifications.There are many for one reason or another would like to see Dnap Fail. Also this product will be used exclusively in a court of law by both sides.The Error rate must be Very Low.If it gets knocked down in court than so do we on the stock exchange.

[SlopsterSlasher]

Easyman51,I have only ONE problem with Dnap,and it really stress me to think of it. But its their WEB Site. Its a Freaken disaster.1}There is all kinds of Old info. on it.
2}Its not user friendly {there's 3 different web sites to go to and you cant get to either one From the other}3} The Forensics slot at their main web site is not updated and gives no access to the other one's.This cant be good for the Comp.It should be all One site with EASY ACCESS to each.Anything is better than what they have now.

1}http://www.dnaprint.com/

2}http://www.ancestrybydna.com/strorder.asp

3}http://dnawitness.net/