InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

joenatural

03/20/09 5:44 PM

#100863 RE: CSykes #100852

Excellent and accurate post.
icon url

Drugdoctor

03/20/09 5:52 PM

#100880 RE: CSykes #100852

For whatever reason - 300 million new shares hitting the market with a gagged TA doesn't sound good!
icon url

abcdefg

03/20/09 5:53 PM

#100883 RE: CSykes #100852

Not allowing the TA to state anything can in my mind means one thing. The LOI submitter is doing an audit, and wants all of the information correct before releasing it to the investor's. This is standard pratice in a buy out prospect. The shares being restricted only ensure that there will not be any shares sold or bought other than what is in the market already.Everything that is an asset must now be accounted for, so that the proper transfer of funds for the value of the assets of the company are equal!!!!!!!
Regards
ABCDEFG
icon url

jimstr

03/21/09 1:28 AM

#101347 RE: CSykes #100852

Uh, Jared just PR'd that the OS is virtually maxed out against the AS. Whats to gag?

What is he hiding?

He cant trust the TA's to do their job

I dont blame him
icon url

jimstr

03/21/09 2:10 AM

#101361 RE: CSykes #100852

Uh, Jared just PR'd that the OS is virtually maxed out against the AS. Whats to gag?

He cant trust the TA's to do their job.

The old one blundered a paper shuffle and mistakenly took it for a raise in OS. Jared fired them. OS restored.

Moves over to another TA

I called the TA the day of the OS change and spoke to Carolyn. She was adamant that she did not give out any OS numbers but 3 respected posters here (ZNSTATED,Oneinamillion, and Pilotheating) posted they called and the raise was 300 million.

I called her again:

She maintained that nobody gave out the OS to any callers. She went on to say that she received an E-mail from Jared on the 15th (Sunday while he was in Korea) instructing the TA to not give out the OS until further notice. Memos went out to all office personnel
(I'm guessing Jared wanted to explain the raise and the buyout offer PR, instead of seeing shareholders dump on the raise in OS with no explanation.)

So in summary, these 3 respected posters:
1) got insider information somewhere else and blamed it on TA ,
or
2) guessed there was an increase and got the exact number right, funnier
or
3) were mistakenly given the OS contrary to written instructions by Jared. Later in the day they (TA) maintained their story

I would gag a blabbermouth too!

Still laughing about your slant on gagging the TA.

Hey Jared, next time you gag the TA, dont tell us you maxed out the AS beforehand.


lol,
Jimstr






I dont blame him