Replies to post #33097 on Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[plaintif2000]

His returning the patents to the company imho is nothing short
of a farce, he is only doing that so he can say that for at
least a microsecond he fullfilled his obligations. IMHO
williamson risks being disbared for what he has done so he's
covering his behind, drago on the other hand has no such
vunerablity--he does have others however. (i also think that
he would like to minimize his exposure just like dewine did
when they didnt participate w/ the derivative action w/ carlos
--imho it was never about being able to negociate w/ carlos it
was because carlos knew they were dirty, likewise williamson
does not imho want the scrutiny surrounding his action taken w/
clyw if you dont beleive me take a look at his web site last
i looked williamson didnt mention his win against clyw--its
not anything to be proud of, and probably not ever, either
he will have enough money to retire and then he will have no
need for a web site to post his wins...sweet)

you can champion drago and richard all you want, but if you
are smart you should realize that there is less of a risk
having a court appointed custodian sort out the boards
disfunctionality before we proceed much further.


all jmho

[droy24]

spoke to you a few times on the phone and for some reason you still do not get it. Now what part of my post that you don't understand what I say that Turrini has investors that can fund the company? what part you don’t understand where I say that Richard has not called Turrini in 3 days, Turrini must have called him at least 50 times already.

[dhwco]

Take a break for a couple of days-
-and all heck breaks loose here. I have a few comments regarding the last 50+ posts.

Reply to talkoption post # 33097

"Additionally, why was there no meeting when CT was the CEO, president and the company had money?" There was a "meeting". It wasn't valid because Carlos and Dotson wouldn't file the necessary documents.

"The CEO is the person in charge and then the president.' Sorry but you are 100% wrong. the CEO and the president are one and the same. There is no provision in our bylaws that allows them to be separate people. When Turrini tried to correct Pattin on this, Pattin and Daic started their witch hunt against him.

"IF RP sold his shares then they would show up on the SEC reporting. Anybody have a link to this fact?" Hadn't heard that allegation. That would be interesting. I would also like to see such a link. In the mean time, can you post where you saw that allegation published?