I don't disagree with your statement regarding cuban. Both sides of the paradigm are used to forward the fascist agenda. I am simply concentrating on the one being used right now. You seem to say that it is o.k. when someone you dislike is targeted and you seem to think it is perfectly acceptable for the media to be used as a tool of the admnistration to attack dissenting voices. I cannot remember an administration ever attacking individuals for expressing contrary views the way this one has. Singleing out individuals and relying on their minions in the media to carry on the jihad. I dont know if Cubans sec charge was the result of loose change or a legitimate investigation into his trading activities or not but i am also suspicious. What I do know for sure is that Santelli and Limbaugh have been targeted by the white house press secretary for no other reason than they expressed dissenting opinions. This was done with full knowledge that the MSM would carry on the crusade for them. Je the plumber may have been an uneducated idiot but he was targeted for no other reason than questioning the policy's of the president or at the time the candidate. The attacks on Palin were the single largest demonstration of how our media is used as a tool by the establishment to sway votes and it could not have been more obvious. Your assertion that those four individuals were tools is correct. They were tools used by an agenda driven media to curry favor for policy by attacking them for dissent. Argue the point if you must but you are simply displaying ignorance of the obvious.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
