Replies to post #155656 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[clawmann]

"The texas case does not involve NEOM IP."

Maybe. Maybe not. Scanbuy is suing Neom for infringing a Scanbuy or Marshalls patent. It could be that Neom's best defense in the Texas case is Neom's own patents, which may well constitute the kind of prior art that a court would need to invalidate the patents that Neom is alleged to be infringing.

[JPetroInc]

"the NY case is the only case to my knowledge where the recently affirmed patent is in question"

Subsequent to PTO's decision to uphold, its validity is no longer in question.

All the Best, JP