InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

dotell

03/02/09 5:45 PM

#14723 RE: arnold #14720

Arnold - I know this engine, concept and all, is coming to market - you can natter away as you will but CPT is surely going to burry your nonsense.

Ponzi is your idea and near as I can tell no one else shares it. I say you have no grounds to malign Schoell or CYPW with this innuendo. If you do - FACTS ONLY please - tell us.

I relax by knowing that there exists a marvelous solution to many of the world's energy problems and that is Cyclone.

icon url

feinanddandy

03/02/09 7:02 PM

#14725 RE: arnold #14720

Arnold,

GM has had the VOLT concept for 25 years, is there a point to your statement?

In 25 years, GM has now lost 95% of its value because they didn't act sooner to the demand. Now CYPW has the technology, and with the right manufacturer will be HUGE someday soon. IMO

You can deny all you want to, the fact is you know as well as anyone else here that this is going to be a huge Company someday.

P.S. I asked you three pointed questions in my last post, please respond at your earliest convenience. Thanks.

Here they are again just in case you need reference:

Posted by: feinanddandy Date: Saturday, February 28, 2009 10:30:49 AM
In reply to: arnold who wrote msg# 14675 Post # of 14724

Arnold, few questions I'd like you to answer:

Was Raytheon's testing of independent nature in your eyes?
Or do you consider it something else, if so, what exactly?
Was their test positive for the data you reference?

I believe this is your post with regard to the test results from Raytheon, please correct me if I am wrong:


Posted by: arnold Date: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 12:19:11 PM
In reply to: None Post # of 14684


"I believe today's news is significant. Today's news makes sense to me. A steam engine that can run on fuel with the complete absence of air is new. The fact that we may have some independent test results is also very important to the success of this company/product."