Replies to post #15665 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[chrisbaskett]

Yes Frog, please explain how my posts attacked him. I do not see how they did.

[frogdreaming]

I said nothing about a reasonable response. I said he had not received valid answers to his questions.

The validity of the answer can only be established by the questioner. The fact that you have provided answers, does not necessarily mean that his questions have been answered correctly. Either you could be misinterpreting the question or he may be phrasing his inquiry incorrectly, leading to a lack of communication. I do not choose to judge.

However, lack of understanding is the primary reason for discussion. Not the basis for it's disruption.

[retired investor]

with all due respect to all posters involved...from a very interested shareholder who seldom posts. i've read all the back and forth posts with interest; but, admittedly my eyes often glase over with the complexity of the discussion. at this point it appears to be beating a dead horse. perhaps it's time to take a complex and detailed discussion such as this private, even to the point of having it with the principals of the company, as opposed to a public board with very limited knowledge of the subject. thank you for consideration of this suggestion, not to mention for the knowledge all of your posts impart to me (but enough on this particular discussion)!