InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

CombJelly

07/15/04 5:10 PM

#39996 RE: JackDye #39991

"cash flow from operations was $240M for the quarter, up from the $206 level in Q1. "

That is excellent news. Remember that Q2 is the slowest quarter. This last CC was probably the worst one I've ever seen. It was about as content-free as anything I have ever experienced outside of TV. It is a puzzler, because there was all kinds of good news sprinkled throughout. K8 sales apparently are much better than anyone has discussed. Yeah, K7 ASPs suck, and they aren't going to improve if history is anything to judge by. But that's ok, they aren't going to be around all that much longer. Despite the feelings of some, it doesn't look like Intel took meaningful marketshare from FASL as far as flash. By meaningful I mean that Intel may have gained ground in low density flash, it doesn't look like FASL lost any of the higher density marketshare.

It also looks like AMD managed to take a little more processor marketshare from Intel.

True, the window had opened for AMD in Q2 like it hasn't been in a long time. Some think they failed to take advantage, but there isn't any real sign they didn't. It takes time to exploit an opening. Intel seems to be stuck in the same hole they are now for another couple of quarters, maybe more. If AMD isn't in a significantly better position by the end of the year, then they missed the brass ring again. But for now, they have a good shot...
icon url

bobs10

07/15/04 5:26 PM

#39999 RE: JackDye #39991

Thanks for the post, it was very informative. It looks like I need to spend more time in the 10q archives also. Just when you think you know everything that is going on, POW! That $19m recovery looms especially large. It kind of makes the last couple of quarter’s look weaker than I thought.

I'm still bullish on the rest of the year but a little more contrite. AMD needs to get itself away from Break Even where these niggling expenses can cause all sorts of mischief.

I was sort of assuming that Hector was trying to manipulate earnings in a conservative way to project steady EPS improvement. I'm not so sure now, looks more like they’ve been scrambling to keep from falling back into the loss column.


icon url

upc

07/15/04 6:24 PM

#40005 RE: JackDye #39991

where do you see the intergraph charge in the Q1 10-Q? thank you, I am trying to find it, and this would mean that 13M net negative change in the Q2 other income category is not yet explained.

Nevermind, I found it.

upc