InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Al4343

07/12/04 2:21 PM

#3572 RE: I4C6S #3571

I4C, I always thought the the KDS6000 was a necessity, and was disappointed when FASC did not aggresively pursue building one once the upgrade recommendations were made. Your post provides further evidence in support of pursuing this. Are we???

Al


icon url

TRCPA

07/12/04 2:23 PM

#3573 RE: I4C6S #3571

I4C6S........thanks very much for your analysis.

To sum up, would we be looking at the following, when comparing the two? And....Any rough % guesses in #2 and #3?

1)Initial cost of KDS/KDS6000 systems would be less than half of that of the initial cost of the Agri-Recycle system.

2)Far less energy costs for KDS/KDS6000 systems vs. Agri-Recycle system. (% of energy requirements of KDS to A-R?)

3)Far less annual/ongoing maintenance costs of KDS/KDS6000 systems vs. Agri-Recycle system (% of maintenance costs of KDS to A-R?).

Note I am only including the KDS/KDS6000 information in the above. An AGES system would add an entirely new dimension that the Agri-Recycle system lacks, I believe.....that is conversion of manure to energy/electricity vs. a fertilizer maker only.