Have you bothered to email Farrel and Oppel to ask for clarification, or to see if they, the authors, agree with your interpretation of their couple of sentences from half a year ago that are constantly being pasted here?
Here is the flaw in the buyback theory. If they are buying back then I see one of two problems
1. If their buying back then why is the rate barely moving which makes the buyback pump null and void considering it's doing squat for the strength
2. If they are buying back which is not effecting the rate then that must mean there are trillions and trillions of dinar out there making the 1 to 1.5 billion buyback miniscule.
Point in case, their suposedly buying back dinars that they flooded the market with. The dinar is not a stock, it's a currency. Until the dinar starts to really move due to this buyback. The buyback pump is weak and full of holes.