Replies to post #9792 on 141 Capital Inc (fka ONCP)

[nicehit]

reed, you think Errol would know that working for the SEC. But who knows... anyway looking forward to next week.

[roiresearch]

if the company had an IR firm that had a clue, then I would like to hear it from them, or better yet, errol

the company has got to clean house and get the IR firm on the right page; if i have questions, who do i go to?

[jcrom56]

REED, the only thing that runs contrary to your thought is the exact wording of the PR. They did not express any INTENTION to begin trading , they clearly stated it the PR that they HAD (past tense)COMMENCED trading. And they say that they will post the results on BarclayHedge as well as on the 141 website. According to Barclay, they were still in the process of adding 141 to the system. Fine. That does not, in my way of thinking, mean 141 could not state the results of the trading which they stated they HAD COMMENCED, on their own website by late December, as they clearly said they intended to do. In the very least, if they did not commence trading ( even though they said that they already had) , I believe they owe you the courtesy of a paragraph explaining why they have not done what they stated they were doing and would report. They could have extended that courtesy with no more time and effort spent than I took commenting in this post.

You guys don't deserve this shabby treatment, IMO.

jc