Replies to post #80847 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[dgplexus]

Goldenstone,

I've spoken with Sarah a few times, and she's been polite and professional. I didn't ask for any information that might constitute material nonpublic information, because I don't want to step on that land mine. (Otherwise, I would have asked her all kinds of questions.) When I inquired about taking the AncestryByDNA test for myself (something I've intended to do, for a long time,) she did say there was a lab instrument that was down, but that it should be fixed in a "few weeks." (That was a week or so ago.) I'll try to get back in touch with her relatively soon, about that.

I'll also see if I can get a sense of just how many of the numerous AncestryByDNA distributors/providers, may actually be running DNAPrint Genomics' tests on their own equipment, and (one would presume) paying licensing fees to DNAPrint. If any such activity is occurring, that would be a previously unknown/unproven (to us) income stream, which would (in my opinion) have important implications, re: DNAG's value and the company's survivability during this financing squeeze.

Daniel

[frogdreaming]

goldenstone, Please be careful with your assumptions. They are incorrect.

the company continues to file patents i see, but no news on them.

The company has not filed any patent applications for years.

Those currently being published now by the patent office were filed for several years ago. There has been no activity from the company in regards to patents since then.

regards,
frog

[ptgame]

goldenstone
There has been activity from the company in regards to keeping up with their current patents applications. The latest example was just a few months ago, See post #80642