Replies to post #4719 on Tri-Valley Corp (fka TVLYQ)

[geoscience2]

Did he say anything about Pleasant Valley production? Huh? What, did you want him to explain why the production numbers on the DOGGR FTP web site, which includes all the wells, was/is so much lower (way less than 1/2) than what he stated the wells were producing in PR's, over and over? He can't do that! He's "precluded" from saying anything about that because of "confidentiality" reasons! Gotta keep that stuff hush hush! Hey, looky over there, forget about Temblor and PV and Eeko and Nevada, and the rigs and the old steamers and ..., we're going to buy that old orphaned property next to Exxon's and build up its "infrastructure" and "production capacity" and then sell it to our government for billions so the US never has to import foreign oil again. LOL

Geo

[jonesieatl]

sunset , I'll have to go back and look ...

... I think they did mention PV. I just scanned it , it's really sickening to read the same old 'stuff' letter after letter , when the 'stuff' from previous letters failed to materialize.

They're sending them out in .pdf format now so you can't really copy and paste. Probably on purpose lol. That excerpt I posted was from a screen shot. When I get time I suppose I could post the whole thing that way.

jonesie