InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BleeckerStreet

01/20/09 4:30 PM

#37245 RE: rdailey4 #37244

Was not retail buyers today.....
Maybe tt and crash and flyer pooled there
paychecks...........IMHO
icon url

patrun

01/20/09 4:31 PM

#37246 RE: rdailey4 #37244

Do you think the pps is low. When I check on Yahoo finance, I see the market value so low regarding the company value. It means to me the pps is undervalued, but we neve know how to play this because this is an up and down stock. GLTY
icon url

mackbryan1

01/20/09 4:35 PM

#37248 RE: rdailey4 #37244

Thats what I thought. A good number were not restricted. It would make sense if this group was purchasing those. But, why would they just not buy RM for that price and retire all the shares?

icon url

Carpedeim357

01/20/09 6:29 PM

#37309 RE: rdailey4 #37244

RD that is correct. As Steve told me last year the first shares issued to rme are not. When I asked him why they where not under the buyback like new ones where he said and I quote. We will make plenty off long term when we grow SPNG off the first shares those we will keep. The rest we have to issue becuase we did not get bank lines as planned last June. It was either provide funds to SPNG with shares as collateral per what RME bank required or shut down. That is why all the newer re shares all will be retired. People just do not get it was a loan but because of only collateral they could offer shares it has to be recorded like they did has shares issued under equity for funds received from rme. Now they are all going to be retired and rem get paid back as planned. Just sooner then planned. Good thing for us because once they are as soapy says in IBOX we are really going to like it this announcement.
icon url

Whiplash_Investor

01/20/09 10:28 PM

#37397 RE: rdailey4 #37244

The first 267M RME shares were restricted