Replies to post #155019 on Eternal Image Inc (fka ETNLQ)

[GodsWatchingYou]

Thank you-do you know if they renewed their licence?

In addition, our license agreement with The Vatican Library Collection recently expired on June 30, 2008. Pursuant to a provision in the expired agreement, we can continue to “sell-off” our present Vatican Library Collection inventory for an additional six-month period (through December 31, 2008.) Presently, we are negotiating with this licensor to renew the expired agreement. The long term plans of the company are to pursue and secure other license arrangements with reputable, household names that will be a good fit with our products.


Be blessed

[Heppie]

Sorry #1 but this is "old news", and very old:) And an "explanation" was given on this also.

[Basser1]

Wow. If I were any of you shareholders on the fence about whether to hold or not, I would read this filing carefully.

http://pinksheets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=6311206

First of all let me clarify the facts as to whether or not I will be holding my shares or not. In my case there is no fence for me to be sitting on and no confusion as to whether I hold or don't. I AM HOLDING AND WILL BE ADDING AS I CAN AFFORD TO!!! Yes I read the filing some time ago when it first came out and again this morning and saw nothing that made me want to sell.

The selling shareholders will sell at a price of $0.02 per share until our shares are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and after that at prevailing market prices or privately negotiated prices.

Each selling shareholder and any of their pledges, assignees and successors-in-interest MAY, from time to time, sell any or all of their shares of common stock on any stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the shares are traded or quoted or in private transactions.

When you did the copy and paste here the entire paragaraph was cut up into pieces that just suited your purpose here. If you read the piece in complete form it says that holders MAY sell their shares not MUST sell their shares. We have been over this in the past many different times.

Has there been a flurry of PR activity lately?

Well a lot of that depends on your definition of flurry, if 4 prs is a flurry then I guess that there has been. If one is to think that this is a pr overload then they also have to take into account the fact that there were no pr's at all for an extended period of time prior to the uplisting being approved by the SEC. Only when approval was received did any pr's come out.

I was particularly entertained by this PR in which a lot of positives are stressed, but no actual numbers are given.
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/090109/20090109005444.html?.v=1
They can't say they lied to you! They just gave you all the information to make the assumption they wanted you to make!

By the time those two days were over, we had booked sales orders into the six-figures and its worth noting that December sales orders alone exceed total sales from the entire third quarter!”

You are entirely right, the company DID NOT LIE and as far as making assumptions about the six figure sales numbers for the two day period if you just assume that six figures was at least 100,000 dollars that is still pretty good isn't it?

The company builds on poor shareholders, pays off the founders (who would not have succeeded without the poor shareholders) handsomely, and throws a few bread crumbs for all the poor shareholders to fight over. LOL.

Yes the company did reward the founders after they had put in their own money in the form of personal loans and worked for the first two years without compensation in many cases. As for the bread crumbs that are left over for the poor shareholders they are going to provide a mighty handsome return on investment in the long run so what is the beef here?

Basser