InvestorsHub Logo

tw2319

01/02/09 10:14 AM

#33437 RE: coaldollars #33436

Never thought of that one. One thing is for sure, they would be in such a "behind" position trying to cover. That would be a nice screw to turn on the nss, that would really fan the flame for the pps to take off that is for sure. But then again, I go back to what Galo had somewhat said on the company post (when it was up) that he didn't think there was an nss position in the first place? But with the math that we all have calculated, there has got to be a nss position.
Anybody else care to add their side of the story?

T.

OLDSCHOOL110

01/02/09 10:18 AM

#33438 RE: coaldollars #33436

Also why don't GALO send notification to their Tranfer Agent and UNGAG them for BIHC to at least give out the Authorized along with current OS and Float to shareholders who call, that would go A LONG way with Transparency here since imo GALO has dropped the ball and needs to show he can be a stand up guy which to this point her hasn't imo......all imo

TEX

01/02/09 11:23 AM

#33455 RE: coaldollars #33436

nothing.

Legit shorts would be dunned for a cash divvy; nekkid shorts, almost by definition, are out of bounds. MMs would cover or short again, others would almost certainly short again...