Replies to post #27317 on Blue Diamond Ventures Inc (BLDV)

[flyonawall]

Mike yes of course you are correct, But thats why I put a (?) on the RM, see I have a hard time understanding why would anyone RM with BLDV when it has no assets or anything to prove of value. Thats why I suggested the only way would be to RS to 3000 to 1. That is if BLDV will ever see anything above trips. Read the message again, It ask a question, RM SOON? I point out that the only way to get to a PPS that others claim this will be at soon. So hope this helps, Your correct an RS is the only way this will rise in PPS. Thanks Mike.

[Zorax]

rm does not mean reverse split???

So, when blvd says it's reverse merging into dvlb (they'll make something up, I'm sure) and states your million shares of blvd will now equal to 100 shares dvlb because of a 10,000 to 1 reduction to facilitate the merger (happens over 95% of pinks).
Of course, your 100 shares of dvlb will be worth maybe 15 cents pps, for about 2 days. Then the pps will dive while you are waiting for the new shares to settle in your broker account if you're retail cash. Why, because everyone except the longs know this to be an empty shell and will try to dump to recoup there losses. Over 90% of the time a reverse merger by a pink shell is most certainly a reverse split by any other name.