Inbev will not be buying Labatts back after 3 years. The whole 3 years thing is the amount of time they have agreed to supply the licensee with product, period!, why, because they will not be selling the brewery until the inbev deal is done, which could take a while. Why is Inbev selling Labatts in the first place, because it was deamed they have too much market share, a monopoly, so they are being forced to sell it. Inbev will not be buying it back in the future, because it would still be considered too much market share.
This is where I have to agree with PKG: Ever since we had the shareholders letter all you have been doing is pumping and pumping and pumping, as if the info we just recieved isn't enough. You should just pump what PK just gave us, pump till the cows come home, but not on this board, on other boards that don't know the story. Now you're pumping possibilities, instead of facts, when there are enough facts out there for you to pump a whole month worth. Let's let the company expand when it does, lets let PK tell us when it's a done deal, let's not set everyone up to be disappointed with more $1 by the end of the week predictions. What you do is really no different than what PKG does. There's about 20 of us here that post on a regular basis, we don't need to read the same post day in day out, tell us once and we'll either agree or disagree. You complain that PKG says the same thing all the time, but you do the same. What's the rumor of the day Sneaky. I was quite happy with the shareholder letter, let's let that stand for a couple of months, let's play around with everything that said, those are concrete plans, let's not continue to fill the board up with possibilities that may never come to fruition, let's let PK be our CEO and tell us what we need to know when he is good and ready, he seems to know what he's doing. As far as I can tell, the only thing all this pumping has led to in the past 6 months is a stock sitting at it's 52 week low.IMO
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
