InvestorsHub Logo

yellowjacket

12/23/08 4:51 PM

#151371 RE: stock_raving_mad #151370

Another *****FIVE STAR***** post from S_R_M! Thanks. YJ.

Drmyke3

12/23/08 6:44 PM

#151374 RE: stock_raving_mad #151370

SRM
thanks for taking the time to post that lengthy and detailed and intelligent rebuttal.
Dr. Mike

JPetroInc

12/23/08 7:55 PM

#151375 RE: stock_raving_mad #151370

SRM thanks for your due dilligence

All your posts are well recieved.

Best, JP

cjzak

12/23/08 10:54 PM

#151376 RE: stock_raving_mad #151370

Nice SRM. I sure want to believe in these patents NEOM has. That's why I bought in when I discovered them via TS. Here I still sit with some dubious shares left in my portfolio. My choice of course. This year should be interesting in the reader arena that's for sure. I just wish some sort of resolution of these patent suits would happen soon or the pps will be completely at 0 and the shareholders bite the dust. There's still a little glimmer left, so who knows what might turn up. Hopefully the pps. Thanks for the positive boost. Cj

success622

12/24/08 1:31 AM

#151377 RE: stock_raving_mad #151370

Thanks S_R_M,
great, detailed post that summarizes this long saga with ScanBuy.
Here's to seeing the resolution in 2009!
Thanks for taking the time to put it together, along with the links for reference all in one post.

jonesieatl

12/24/08 6:52 AM

#151378 RE: stock_raving_mad #151370

Yes, thanks SRM ...

... oh, it would be nice if all of your suppositions, beliefs, maybes and disparagement of Scanbuy and their CEO hold merit and NeoMedia, the lowly seemingly 'do nothing' ne'er do well, will prevail.

I'm not sure all the 'believes' and continuous slurs against "ScaMbuy" are going to win the day. Maybe if we all mock them that way 10 or 20 more times it will help NeoMedia get some business. I guess we'll see.

What the USPTO has put out so far sure doesn't "seem" to indicate any "plot" has "failed". If there was a "plot", it seems to have succeeded so far. Maybe it was just a good plan which has succeeded so far, but I guess "plot" does have more zing to it.

So far what we see as facts indicate that nobody believes NeoMedia holds any cards in this game. And I seriously doubt the chances of everybody at Scanbuy turning out to have congenital defects in the truth-telling area. Others have been slandered, from TS to PP to anyone else who has dared to doubt NeoMedia actually has a business plan. So far, all of those disparaged have turned out to be correct. All. I wonder if Scanbuy and the EFF will be added to the group of winners, while all involved with NeoMedia remain losers.

"all the “BS” that ScaMbuy"

"It’s hard to believe these guys are for real."

"They don’t seem to understand"

"Maybe MFR is paying license fees to NeoMedia?"

"I believe this is further evidence that ScaMbuy is the one who is backing EFF"

"The MFR patent # 6,886,750 looks like"

"To me this is very far remote from what NeoMedia is doing."

"These guys at ScaMbuy remind me of “BAGHDAD BOB”"

"I believe that this law suit proves that Jonathan Bulkeley CEO of ScaMbuy was caught in a lie."

"Maybe they are all congenital liars at ScaMbuy???"

"and ScaMbuy’s patents don’t do that."

"ScaMbuy’s"

"ScaMbuy"

"Could it be that they now know that their devious, and sinister plot with the EFF reexam has utterly failed,"

"the NeoMedia infringement law suit against them has become rock solid, and will crush their business."

"I believe"

“BIG” bluffing hand. Oh,……………….the humiliation!!!!!"

"ScaMbuy’s"

"ScaMbuy"

"ScaMbuy"

"ScaMbuy"

Thanks for the try, maybe the patent office will see it your way.

jonesie

cloud3

12/24/08 10:03 AM

#151381 RE: stock_raving_mad #151370

Nice post, but the question remains: WHEN will NEOM go on the offensive for all this BS? When will they finally behave like a company that isn't going to stand for all this blatant interference? When, when, when?

Or is it an IF thing...?