I guess we can only speculate as to whether I was ever hired or not but for now that is a moot point. I won't bash and I won't pump I'll just call it like I see it like a good umpire.
I understand the reason Clayton bought SNV is because he was one of the original investors who also got a lot of his friends to buy in. He is trying to make up to them for the bad investment he got them into.
My question is this: If SNV was such a bad investment then what makes it a good investment now??
Apparently Clayton had a lot of his own money tied up in SNV so he stands to lose more than anyone here.
THAT IS WHY HIS LACK OF TRANSPARENCY BOTHERS ME!!!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
