InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

frogdreaming

12/15/08 4:41 PM

#80291 RE: dgplexus #80288

Perhaps you should read it again.

Nowhere does that quote contradict the fact that DNAPrint Genomics' intellectual property, in the Ancestry Informative Markers, is an advantage.

"The MHMM makes it possible to identify genomic blocks of a particular ancestry by use of any high-density single-nucleotide–polymorphism panel. One application of our method is to perform admixture mapping without genotyping special ancestry-informative–marker panels."

Clearly if the same information can be obtained without using "special ancestry informative-marker panels" [AIM's], then there is no 'intellectual property' advantage to those AIM panels. To the contrary, paying extra for AIM panels to obtain the same information that is available without them, would seem to be a disadvantage.

regards,
frog
icon url

frogdreaming

12/15/08 4:54 PM

#80293 RE: dgplexus #80288

As I recall it just took you an extraordinarily long time to understand the discussion.

I am not, contrary to what you claimed, subject to insider trading restrictions. Merely disclosure requirements...

If you still don't understand that those 'disclosure requirements' are in fact trading restrictions, then perhaps we are not done yet.

You seem to think that the SEC can read minds and their 'restrictions' only apply after some kind of mind probe. LOL

You are subject to the same restrictions as Frudakis and Gabriel, (who haven't been mind probed recently either). lol)

There is a reason that the SEC has those restrictions. They assume that people who invest in companies want to have as much information about the company they invest in as possible. They assume that if information is available to an investor then he or she takes advantage of that information. They base their 'insider' definition on those assumptions. Large shareholders are subject to the same restrictions as management. They don't have any way of knowing that you have not taken advantage of your position. There is no check off box on the disclosure forms that says that you do not want to know any information. They assume you have it and, if and when an issue arises, they will make you prove that you don't. Good luck with that.

regards,
frog