Replies to post #80271 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

Of course not. Anything that had any intrinsic value whatsoever would be taken over, broken up, or sold to a knowledgeable buyer, long before it descended to such a sorry state.

[Porgie Tirebiter]

If you are talking about DNAG, I don't think it even qualifies as a penny stock.

And they do not seem to be actively engaged in business anymore.

[dgplexus]

Hi fsail52,

I'm not sure what the most dramatic sub-penny success stories have been. I haven't really delved into the history of that. I know the successes can be very dramatic. Sorry I don't have the definitive figures on that, with which to answer your question.

Here's something I just posted on Google Finance, to a detractor who was asking (deceptively, of course,) if DNAPrint Genomics can compete with Google (Google doesn't offer ancestry testing, but they are linked to the company, 23andMe) :

--
DNAPrint Genomics has an advantage over competitors (such as 23andMe, the competitor linked to Google,) in that they own the Ancestry Informative Markers intellectual property.

Unlike the broad scattergun approach the few competitors employ, these markers are reportedly much more informative, and produce more clearly delineated clusters, when the results are graphed. In other words, those markers are more informative (hence the word, "informative," in "Ancestry Informative Markers.")
--

Daniel Gannon
Potland, Oregon, USA