Replies to post #80216 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[dgplexus]

Regarding that erroneous Reuters "gift" designation (I actually paid cash for all DNAG shares I own,) I have just filed a request with Reuters (Editorial and News correction request.) Here is the text of my request:

--
Reuters:

My share purchases of DNAG (DNAPrint Genomics, Inc.,) are erroneously listed as "Gift," instead of "Buy." I bought every share, as my SEC filings show. There were no "gift" shares.

Here is a link that shows this error:
http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/insiderTrading?symbol=DNAG.PK&name=GANNON+DANIEL

I've been receiving accusations that these were "gifts," rather than purchases, based solely on this error. Can you please correct it, or at least email me with an explanation?

Thanks in advance,

Daniel Gannon
Portland, Oregon, USA
--

P.S., to reiterate what I have plainly stated before, I am only considered an "insider" in the sense that I have purchased so many DNAG shares on the open market, and have filed accordingly with the SEC (Form 3, Form 4, and Schedule 13D. Soon to file another Form 4, and a Schedule 13D amendment (13D/A.)) There is nothing else that would characterize me as a DNAG "insider." I'm merely purchasing shares on the open market. I do not have any inside info., etc., etc.

Daniel Gannon
Portland, Oregon, USA

[gracemwjt2000]

Dan, I beg to differ - that it shows as gift status because of the sub penny trade price. If you look at this link, it shows many, many gifts - even when it was trading above sub penny, gifts are shown at 0

http://www.reuters.com/finance/stocks/insiderTrading?symbol=DNAG.PK