Replies to post #15132 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

I didn't bring up the possibility that they would not respond due to my posting record, it was a valued member of this forum who broached the possibility. I am merely offering a mitigation for that eventuality.

If you have some other good reason for not wishing to assist in this effort, that's fine with me. The forwarding of an e-mail being such an expenditure of time and effort after all.

If you won't do it, and I completely respect that choice, then perhaps someone else in good standing will step forward. DougS, I imagine that I can deduce from the tone of your response that you are not interested...?

Work2play....you were actively engaged in the process, surely you would like to get some answers?

Anyone..?

[Easyman51]

Having been Long since .235, averaging down to .052, it is dishearting to be sitting at .0265. There isn't a chance that I will unload for a loss, just voicing my displeasure at the moment. For those who have been around for awhile, I use to post under PattrnMkr1. I do believe in DnaPrint and Dr. Frudakis & Team and the ultimate direction & solutions they are attempting to arrive at. If it weren't for the consistant statement of facts by those Longs on this board (and others) I'd probably be long gone and miss out on the Party I believe is coming.

Boat Drinks/Peace