InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

opportunityknocking

10/09/08 10:38 AM

#16734 RE: opportunityknocking #16732

I mean it when I say I truly would never wish you or anyone close to you to get cancer, but hypothetically wouldn't you want the cancer identified early and after treatment the piece of mind that it could easily be monitored God forbid it returned OR SPREAD SOMEWHERE ELSE? That is why I don't understand your obsession with our failure. These are "stand up and take notice" results. You have to admit that. The ISOBM is the perfect platform to get this data noticed.
icon url

Kag

10/09/08 10:44 AM

#16735 RE: opportunityknocking #16732

Opportunity Knocking,
You posted: "Now what? Still in denial?"

My comment: An investor should be wondering how the data would have turned out in the real world of testing if the samples of blood to be tested had not been labeled as to what kind of cancer the cancer patients had? Obviously the cancer samples tested were already labeled because RECAF tests cannot differentiate between different types of cancer. What cutoff level of RECAF would have been used if the type of cancer was not previously known? There would have been no way to know in the real world. kag