InvestorsHub Logo

MCA

10/08/08 9:51 AM

#62894 RE: TraderRick47 #62893

I certainly hope #3 is not seriously on the table. The idea that he would deliberately trash UDHC, and my stake in it, so that he could empty the shell and take the company private is so upsetting that he would certainly have more than phone calls to worry about.

eom

h2omd0

10/08/08 9:57 AM

#62896 RE: TraderRick47 #62893

I have believed Clayton, and I am holding.
The last 2 PRs said he was buying back shares.
I do not expect another PR until that is finished.
No I do not like the PPS but he is either honest or he is not.
I believe he is honest. With that choice you will buy or sell.
Good luck.

Chiron

10/08/08 10:15 AM

#62898 RE: TraderRick47 #62893

Okay Rick let's look at this logically:

1. Why would you? It's a penny stock.

2. Joking about revenues is somewhat misleading as people consider you a source of information here. But that's your prerogative.

3. I don't blame him for being upset, someone took this too far and that is simply wrong. However, many companies deal with a lot worse and continue operations. Brush it off and move forward - let the authorities handle this. Again, there is no excuse for that type of behavior.

4. But you are. You post statements from Clayton that are privately sent to you on a public forum. You post phone conversations about items not yet PR'd. You are representing the company Rick.

5. Won't be long is a matter of opinion. Weeks? Months? Years? Never? That is a pretty bold statement to make, and very very speculative based on the fact Clayton has not shown any results so far.

6. Wrong. A good CEO communicates with shareholders responsibly and does not set timelines he cannot meet. As in 'signed contract within a week' over a month ago. Clayton is not a 'bad person' , nor is he a 'bad CEO'. He simply is an inexperienced CEO that seems to be fumbling his way through developing this business. He did not have to take this public - he chose to go this route and he has responsibilities to his shareholders. He has not communicated long term plans, he has PR short term fluff that he does not follow up on.

7. Smart shareholders sold out of this over 10 cents. Clayton has not provided any long term goals. Again, just PR's that say 'we're going to do a, b, and c tomorrow' but never 'we've completed a, b, and c'. Speculative shareholders will continue to hold here, but I am not sure this is 'smart', more 'risky'.

8. That is a very speculative statement. But if you are right it could be a 'game changer' here. Like I have said many times here; show us the results. Take the 'speculation' out of this stock and put the 'facts' in it and you will have buyers.
If 6 million has been bought back, and the float is 3 million and this is proven, and he follows up with a signed contract - this has big potential.

That is why I am here. I am waiting for a reason to buy this stock. But for now it is way too speculative. I don't mind paying 5 cents for something that will be worth 50 cents, but I won't pay .015 cents for something that is more likely to end up at .005.

To summarize: Walk the walk and you will have buyers. Keep talking the talk and this will sink to sub-penny.

cowboys9to81

10/08/08 11:57 AM

#62907 RE: TraderRick47 #62893

If this guy is gonna screw over all the people that have been giving him money over the last months over one persons phone call then I dont even have words to describe how messed up that is. And yes we do deserve an update although if we got one we all know it would just be another "promise" with absolutley no follow through. Hes hiding and he doesent care about us! Your welcome for all the vacation money!