Does this mean that smart investors would be lined up around the corner to give their $$ to a company which has a "CEO/leader" who either misleads investors about his/her true identity, or simply refuses to disclose it? Or what's the conclusion here, if any?
Without myself knowing truth or falsity of the claims in the report... that's the overall question I've come away with. Oh, that and the idea that 2 of the 4 primary claims in the report seem to have been verified already, no? With 2 more still not certain yet. And 1 retracted.
Did it REALLY take some message board "report" to finally get some conclusion of real identity and past from the CEO/leader???? Seriously? Or is that still up for debate?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
