InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Klonopin2mg2000

09/27/08 12:40 PM

#3770 RE: sunspotter #3769

JM2SENSE! the same folks that thanked you for that very thinking will more likely be sending you hate mail in the future when the company is ready to answer a few of your questions....just not on your clock.

good luck with your forever negative attitude.....

please take careful time to respond to these allegations you made in your post...tia

"I'm not here to save anybody, I'm here because I have a hobby of studying likely scam stocks, and those who feed off them, such as their toxic finance partners and their message board promoters."

i must hear this...ought to be an interesting post since your being so sincere.lol

interesting hobby you have......mine are family, hiking, running and spending time with friends..

ENJOY LIFE NOW!

klon' is now gone..........why don't you get out today and do as i do....

"TAKE A HIKE!"

for your own good...


icon url

palacian

09/28/08 7:02 PM

#3777 RE: sunspotter #3769

sun, amazing how self agrandizing.

my one point, your attack of biophan is always based
on mgmt, finance, pps and related. these are easy
targets especially when based on charts and trends.
hard to argue on that basis. what you avoid is any
discussion of science. never mentioned or debated
by you except with relation to chart and pps.

1) Why haven't Biophan ...
how about they have, but didn't inform you or any of us?

2) How are they going to deal with their new senior debtors,...
are you insinuating toxic financing or just old folks with
money on the line?

3) Why in their recent public announcement have they focused on a "strategy" of acquision ...
as in any chess game, not all moves or statements are fully
transparent. ex, could be watch my right hand waving in
the air while my left hand picks your brains right between
your ears.

4) Will any new acquisitions result in the syphoning off of tens of millions of dollars from Biophan's balance sheet into private hands...
the kieratsu did not work in this country because we are
initially cynical. your insinuation of been done before
may be missplaced since the original biomed loan was at a
loss to generate free cash although many saw it as mw lining
his pockets while he was not. that had to do with a bridge
loan which was not favorable to mw at that time but in light
of kieratsu, many did not grasp the need and assumed the
worst. it has been brought up many times since as a negative.
easy to insinuate, hard to prove.

please do not spam the board with other stocks. your
reference has not been discussed on this board at all
to my knowledge. even so it is irrelevant.

utterly predictable, you are. (but not one whit less sad for all that predictability.) and whatever that means.