InvestorsHub Logo

follylama

09/22/08 2:09 PM

#67213 RE: ieddyi #67208

Ultimate Cost of Bailout Could Be Capitalism:
Smartmoney.com

By Jonathan Hoenig -- Published: September 22, 2008


"I KNOW OF NOBODY who is arguing over the amount of money or even that the secretary ought to have the authority to purchase these toxic instruments, these bad debts," said Sen. Christopher Dodd (D., Conn.), chairman of the Senate Banking Committee.


Well, Senator, had you or Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson truly bothered to ask around, you'd surely have found more than a few honest, taxpaying citizens who are, like me, completely outraged over the size, scope and nature of the unprecedented plan to push this country further toward total socialist rule.

Wealth creation isn't simply the act of signing a check or printing a dollar bill. Creating wealth -- the type of wealth that yields new advancements and jobs, and enhances human life -- is a result of reason, hard work and long-range planning. Wealth isn't born of a governmental decree or redistribution of wealth. Yet that's exactly the path down which Dodd, Paulson, President Bush and the rest of the federal government continue to push.


First the feds nationalized mortgage giants Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE). Then it was AIG (AIG), the nation's largest insurance company. (Curiously, Lehman Brothers, the No. 4 investment bank, was left to file bankruptcy.) Now the government is seeking to start a $400 billion pool to insure money market assets, which investors had previously understood not to be insured.


It doesn't end there. Uncle Sam further plans a $700 billion fund to buy, well, whatever types of assets it wants. Originally envisioned as a repository for soured mortgage bets, as late as Sunday night, the Treasury Department reportedly revised plans to include what it terms "troubled assets." Those could be student loans, credit-card debt, non-U.S. assets, or anything else that happens to strike Paulson's fancy. You couldn't design a more inherently corrupt and arbitrary policy if you tried.


As it now stands, the plan would spend as much as the annual budgets of the Departments of Education, Defense and Health and Human Services combined. Of course, that can and surely will change, quite possibly by the time you get done reading this.


Already being tacked on are the politically populist measures to keep "struggling homeowners" from losing their houses and limit executive compensation. At all firms or just those participating in the scheme? Nobody knows. Nobody knows anything at all. The rules by which honest businessmen attempt to function are now changing on literally an hour-by-hour basis.


The government has also made it illegal to sell short 899 financial stocks, a bizarrely arbitrary list that included Silver State Bancorp (SSBX), an already failed bank recently closed by the FDIC, but initially not General Electric (GE), American Express (AXP) of many obvious others. The ban is in effect only until Oct. 2. After that who knows? What about the options traders who must sell short in order to be able to effectively make markets? What about the thousands of investors big and small who sell short to hedge their stock exposure? What about the billions of dollars invested into short-selling products like ProShares UltraShort Financials (SKF)? Who knows?

When laws are made without the benefit of a Constitutional vetting or vote, confusion reigns. Not even the pros know what the heck is going on, which is exactly why the markets are now regularly swinging 400 points a day with little regard to economic fundamentals. When markets are dictated by bureaucrats, earnings and analysis are no longer relevant.

Indeed, instead of property rights and the rule of law, the country is now being governed by spur-of-the-moment plans devoid of any long-range thinking. Just listen to our own president: "Look, I'm sure there are some of my friends out there saying, 'I thought this guy was a market guy. What happened to him?'" Bush told a Washington press conference. "Well, my first instinct wasn't to lay out a huge government plan. My first instinct was to let the market work until I realized, upon being briefed by the experts, of how significant this problem became."


The message is that we believe in free markets until times get tough, at which point capitalism goes out the window and is replaced by Venezuelan-style nationalization and rule-by-decree.


And make no mistake, that's exactly what we are witnessing. Without so much as a single vote, the supposedly fiscally conservative Bush administration has achieved an economic coup d'etat, completely abandoning the free-market principles on which this country was built. In its place is crony capitalism in which individual property rights and the proper role of government -- as referee, not starring actor -- has disappeared altogether. The icing on the cake: The trillion-dollar price tag that accompanies Paulson's plan is being paid for by lifting the ceiling on the federal debt to $11.3 trillion, having already been raised earlier this year.


Just pick up a newspaper from the last few days and you'll quickly see that Bernanke, Paulson, Bush, Dodd, Rep. Barney Frank (D., Mass.) and the rest are flying by the seat of their pants, ruling on an ad-hoc basis and, quite obviously, making up directives as they go along.


It's impossible to plan long-range when the country's leaders can't see past the next edition of the Washington Post. As I've been pointing out for weeks now, traditional economic analysis simply does not work. Big Brother is now calling the shots.


What to own at a time like this? I have increased my holdings of Japanese yen, physical gold and cash. As distraught as I am to admit it, there's no question that the draconian and abusive maneuvers of the past few weeks puts us ever further down a very bleak and dangerous path.


Jonathan Hoenig is managing member at Capitalispig Hedge Fund LLC.


See also: Hoenig archive at Smartmoney.com




Media Appearances
Cavuto on Fox Business Network, Weekdays at 5PM CT
Cashin' In on Fox News Channel, Saturdays at 10:30AM CT
Don Wade and Roma on WLS 890AM, Tuesdays at 6:40AM CT

LIVE EVENT: The Money Show Keynote Address, Washington DC, November 6th



Capitalistpig Asset Management LLC
531 South Plymouth Court
Suite 604
Chicago, Illinois 60605





Forward email

This email was sent to jeancarnone@aol.com by newsletter@capitalistpig.com.
Update Profile/Email Address | Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe™ | Privacy Policy. Email Marketing by


Capitalistpig Asset Management LLC | 531 South Plymouth Court | Suite 604 | Chicago | IL | 60605

F6

09/23/08 12:31 AM

#67270 RE: ieddyi #67208

ieddyi -- re your hero Asshett (sorry, momentary dyslexia), and generally:

---


[ http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/images/dow_36000_1.png (in case the image next below disappears after awhile)]

---


DOW 36,000 by James K. Glassman & Kevin A. Hassett

Price: $1.75

Condition: Used - Good
Qty. Available: 1
Date Added: 09-14-2008
Regular Shipping: $3.50
Express Shipping: not available
Int'l Shipping: not available

DOW 36,000: The New Strategy for Profiting from the Coming Rise in the Stock Market
by James K. Glassman & Kevin A. Hassett
Hardback Random House 1999 294 pages

At the heart of Glassman and Hassett's argument is the idea that stocks have been undervalued for decades and that, for the next few years, investors can expect a dramatic one-time upward adjustment in stock prices.

Book condition is Very Good. Light wear on dust cover. The interior pages are clean without underlining, highlighting or tears.

Shipping and Handling charges for this item are $3.50
All orders shipped with Delivery Confirmation.

We offer combined shipping on multiple purchases. You pay full shipping charge for the item with the highest shipping rate and only $1.00 for each additional item.

Thank You

TBY41996

http://www.atomicmall.com/view.php?id=38009

---

from "Comparing Obama's and McCain's economic advisors", Sunday, September 21, 2008 ( http://lippard.blogspot.com/2008/09/comparing-obamas-and-mccains-economic.html ):

Kevin Hassett - source [ http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/26/business/26supply.html ]
Hassett has been widely ridiculed [ http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/2005_archives/000025.html (good read, including the comments)] for writing the book Dow 36000: The New Strategy for Profiting from the Coming Rise in the Stock Market in 1999, predicting that the Dow would hit 36,000 within five years, if not sooner.

---

McCain: Know Him By His Staff
September 21, 2008 10:59 AM
http://poliwatch.org/remers/2008/09/21/mccain_know_him_by_his_staff.php

---

Ode To McCainiac Recession-Deniers

I can barely type (Damn you, broken wrist!) but feel compelled to mock McCainiac recession-deniers, like Kevin Hassett of the American Enterprise Institute [ http://thinkprogress.org/2008/06/09/mccain-hassett-recession/ ]. Apparently, reports of the soaring cost of daily necessities and other bad economic news are “politically motivated pessimism” meant to boost Obama’s candidacy.

Ode To McCainiac Recession-Deniers (Limerick)
By Madeleine Begun Kane

Behold the recession-denier!
As inflation and job loss surge higher,
He will stubbornly claim
Lib’ral press is to blame
For making us think things are dire.

http://www.madkane.com/madness/2008/06/13/ode-to-mccainiac-recession-deniers/

---

Kevin Hassett’s misguided Regulation FD rant

posted on April 15, 2008 at 11:11 am

This is probably the most idiotic article [ http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=a8AhwKwDZkto&refer=home ] I’ve ever come across on Bloomberg. Kevin Hassett mouths off about Reg FD in such a convoluted misguided way that it makes me wonder… If he’s a adviser to John McCain, then the US is going to be headed for some real economic trouble if McCain wins.

In the old days, if you were a big customer and heard speculation that a firm such as Bear was in trouble, you might call up the boss and ask him about it. If the rumor was that the firm was flat broke, then he might invite you to his office and show you his list of assets to calm you down.

Alternatively, if a chief executive received a number of troubling phone calls, he might summon a highly respected analyst to his office and open up his filing cabinets. If things checked out, the analyst would then issue a report saying that the bad rumors were unfounded. If he tried to get cute and profit personally from the opportunity, then insider-trading laws would apply.

Such a common-sense response to false rumors is now a crime. The law makes innuendo-based attacks far too easy.


Well, why can’t you just publish your news on Bloomberg? Tell everyone that you are OK, instead of just sharing it with one or two people? The law certainly makes widespread publishing OK.

What Mr. Hassett is really saying is that there are reasons why a company should not disclose information in the full public domain. Those reasons include legal liabilities that the information must be true (ie the company cannot spread counter-rumors). In effect, Mr. Hassett says that short sellers can use rumors to drive prices down, but the company cannot now use rumors (ie assertions not completely evidenced) to counter. And he blames Regulation FD.

Oh boo hoo. First and foremost, there is absolutely no damn reason that any company should not be able to announce anything it wants to the broader market under FD. Just beware, no favoring privileged insiders. If that affects disclosure standards by companies, tough. If you really want to make them disclose more, just modify accounting standards or laws. Anything they disclose on their own is optional anyway, and you are dependent on an illusory faith in good governance.

A second stupid part of this article

A study by economists Armando Gomes, Gary Gorton, and Leonardo Madureira of the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania found that earnings-forecast errors for small companies skyrocketed after Reg FD was passed, suggesting that it is mucking up information transmission even in normal times.

Yeah no shit. But Mr. Hassett assumes that information transmission is of the utmost importance. This is patently untrue. If information transmission was the only factor in market design, one would actually allow insider trading. Insiders would be able to transmit their knowledge most efficiently by trading on the stock. The stock price would then reflect all information, both public and private. Efficient market hypothesis, strong flavored.

He of course does not discuss why information transmission could be secondary to fairness.

I can’t believe this guy is a director of anything.

http://tradecoholdco.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/kevin-hassetts-misguided-regulation-fd-rant/

---

As a Lobbyist, Rick Davis Claimed that Fannie and Freddie Reduce Systemic Risk

Friday, September 19, 2008

It takes unbelievable gall for McCain to try to pin Obama to Fannie and Freddie when his current campaign manager and numerous other McCain campaign officials lobbied (see Halperin [ http://thepage.time.com/obama-camp-memo-on-alleged-mccain-ties-to-fannie-freddie/ ] and Aravosis [ http://www.americablog.com/2008/09/mccain-campaign-manager-rick-davis-paid.html ] for some great documentation) on behalf of the GSEs.

But not only did Rick Davis lobby for Fannie and Freddie, I dug up (really a simple google search) this letter Davis wrote to OFHEO in 2001 (PDF [ http://www.ofheo.gov/Media/Archive/docs/sysrisk/homeowner.pdf ] ) where he makes the argument that not only did Fannie and Freddie not pose a threat of systemic risk but he actually claims that they decreased systemic risk:

"Still others have and will try to make the argument to OFHEO that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac create systemic risk. Those that say that do so either because they are hostile to homeownership or because they have competitive needs to try to hamper the two most efficient private sector engines for homeownership. The Homeownership Alliance hopes that OFHEO will scrutinize the motives of those who make such claims.

Any objective analysis of the roles played by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would show that they in fact reduce systemic risk while anchoring a housing finance system in which consumers have the upper hand."


How Rick Davis even has a campaign job after writing that in the aftermath of the Fannie and Freddie disaster is beyond me. Could you imagine if that was David Plouffe? Maybe some journalist can ask McCain about Davis' quote.

But I guess making wrong predictions that should humiliate most of us actually is a badge of honor with McCain (I'm thinking of you Kevin Hassett [ http://econ4obama.blogspot.com/2008/02/hillary-uses-discredited-mccain-advisor.html ] --author of "Dow 36000" and McCain advisor [ http://econ4obama.blogspot.com/2008/06/other-list-mccains-economists.html ]).

http://econ4obama.blogspot.com/2008/09/as-lobbyist-rick-davis-claimed-that.html

---

and see (items linked in):

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=32347731

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=32347589 (the link there is the link to the full legislative history of that bill)

. . .