A 'VP of Marketing' being the same as a Corporate VP (aka a Corporate Officer)? Utter nonsense. A Corporate Officer has to file SEC documents on their stock activity while a 'VP of Marketing' (not being a CO) does not. Sieve still leaks? More nonsense. 90% claims being bogus? Maybe under CJ and MC's watch. But lets get real, the company has changed dramatically since then. Also, read our public disclaimer again, as it states that this thread does not offer investment advice. It just appears to me that blame for ones own personal choices seems to be the norm of a few. Granted, past management made horrific choices and the end result has been a pps in the old crapper, followed by much greater dilution that none of us wanted or deserved. Are we all pissed? Hell yes. But we all heard SS's whistle indicating to sell and we all saw the warning signs along the way. Yet you & I both 'freely' chose to remain shareholders. IMHO, nothing that NeoMedia or anybody else says would dissway such a firmly negative posture, as whatever is conveyed is most always met with being stuck on bad. I stand by my post and all its contents, conspiracy theories and all. Enjoy your day as well, as this is nonproductive and somewhat too time consuming.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
