how sad! I suppose it seemed like a "cute" idea when you originally thought of it, but remember there's always some "sicko" out there willing to take any idea to the extreme. oh great, back to this argument... zzzzzzzz.... One only can hope that you do not start receiving "scans" of maimed or dead cats, from those fools hoping to "top" your photos. ironic, I haven't received any yet. I guess You Are Dumb and your theory sucks. Maybe you should add to your page the requirement that only scans of LIVE cats will be accepted.Though scanning any live creature does indeed seem inherently cruel, because the creature will be exposed to the scanning light and it's damaging effects. skin cancer! aaaack! run! Why not run a contest for the cutest shots of LIVE cats/ dogs, or perhaps ones showing the most unusual breeds/ color combinations/etc. because that would be Dumb. Don't they do that shit on AOL? Unless, and it does seem likely, that like Howard Stern, you're just out to shock and horrify , thus providing your viewers with the opportunity to criticize and in turn be made fool of by you. Seems you have created a controversy and like a naughty child are enjoying the grown up's distaste. Not the most adult activity but then possibly we're not dealing here with an adult. It now seems to have taken on a life of it's own, this disturbing contest concept, and judging from your viewer responses no one seems to find the concept funny, but rather pathetic. Let's hope you'll tire of this and switch to something more humane and productive. Humane Society member
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
