InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

cosmoworld7

05/28/04 4:29 PM

#25648 RE: iOwnSomeNVEI #25643

although I think that logic is rather absurd (if you dont me saying) but even if it was true, it only benefits new shareholders and NOT those who have been loyal for years. imo. eom
icon url

spokeshave

05/28/04 10:12 PM

#25653 RE: iOwnSomeNVEI #25643

iOwn: Re: What if these guys cared so much about the share holders to get a good deal they hold off on funding, dilute the shares for shareholders to get in at a low price, when all is ready get the finding and market the tech.

I see a couple of small problems with that scenario:

1) In general, companies are interested in making the share price go up, not down.

2) To delay funding and tech commercialization for 3 years in a highly competitive market, in order to give the shareholders a "good deal" seems to give the competition an unnecessary significant advantage.

3) The vast majority of shareholders would benefit far more from a higher share price than a lower one.

4) Blatant share price manipulation and deliberate dilution to lower share price is quite illegal.

Other than that, it sounds great.
icon url

hitimer

05/29/04 1:59 AM

#25657 RE: iOwnSomeNVEI #25643

Al, if only nv mgmt could divine what the s/h's response to a dropping price might be: sell (fear)?
buy (greed)? Since their oiuja (?sp) board is in for repairs, I think that they would be derelict - and up for SEC scolding - for not releasing the material news immediately. And they know that.
Rob