Replies to post #148335 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[JPetroInc]

While AB eliminates Claims #15, 16, 50, 51, 85 & 86, he also simultaneously amends (broadens) Claims #1, 17, 28, 32, 36, 52, 63, 71, 87 & 92 with the largest but all similar changes being made to Claims #1, 36 # 71. For me personally, I think the entire patent review process is too involved and requires the professional skill sets of NeoMedia's lawyers and PTO Examiners to be able to make an early judgement call as to just how the PTO will rule. But I do believe the patents are an integral and essential part of NeoMedia's overall makeup and they need to be considered integral in their ability to command future licensing revenue.

All the Best, JP

[jonesieatl]

Do we not see the examiner ....

... directly contradicting some of the statements of the patent owner's representative in this Continuation Sheet?

Patent owner states something is NOT disclosed, and examiner states that it IS disclosed?

Could be clearer, but that's what I get when parsing it.

Patent owner is left with submitting amendments for further consideration by examiner.

jonesie