Replies to post #14692 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[chrisbaskett]

Frog, I personally don't put much weight on the impact of disgruntled shareholders stating their displeasure at a shareholder's meeting. Might piss Gsbriel off but do you actually think it will change anything? Nope.

[mingwan0]

frog, I agree that "there will be some significant announcement made at the meeting or during the run up to it". We might perhaps differ in our perceptions of what the substance of such an announcement(s) might be!
I do not think that there will be any "confrontation" at the shareholders meeting personally. The company officers are professionals, and the people that have indicated that they are going to attend are all reasonable folks. I believe that it will be a civilized and informative affair. There are a number of issues that people would like to understand further and a number of valid questions have been raised (using nitya's criteria). Are you still pulling together a list of the questions to be sent to DNAP or has this exercise fallen somewhat by the wayside? Would you like me to do this or to help you with it? I am quite prepared to include spook's questions (with some subtle revision that would not alter the semantics but would assist with conformance to the aforementioned criteria). In the absence of such a list I would imagine that the meeting attendees will raise questions themselves, but there might not be representation of all of the issues that some people would like addressed. Let us know how (or if) you would like to proceed.