The hyperlink in the recent ABVG financial P
R directed my browser to a 2003 financial statement.
Do you remember the financial statement that listed $16,000,000.00 + in income ?If I remember correctly ,your rebuttal was that they must have derived that income from selling stock.
Nevertheless,What was that income used for if all the mining deals were none existing ? I'm telling you that no one is that careless with shuffling around money of that size.
Mining claims and real property deeds can more easily be transfered.
All the PR'd claims of ABVG ownership could easily been a secondary agreement with the title holders of the properties.
More than likely insiders.
Trust me,the Canadian government is all over this.
The increase in OS is likely a further attempt at getting back all the shares for when the assets are returned,willingly or not.
I don't have time for these trivial matters at this time.
Good luck at trying to keep your nose clean.