InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

iwondertoo

08/27/08 11:15 AM

#138041 RE: oilphant #138038

I sure wish someone else would chatter about it, besides you and BB. This is getting old.
icon url

Strategyone

08/27/08 11:19 AM

#138042 RE: oilphant #138038

are you sure that's not just "chatter" in your own mind? LOL
icon url

brez63

08/27/08 11:27 AM

#138044 RE: oilphant #138038

thanks for sharing with us

Brez
icon url

gasman48

08/27/08 12:42 PM

#138049 RE: oilphant #138038

to your credit
you have stated for a VERY long time that erhe would not be erhe when either the bit hit the floor or oil flowed little did we know it would be such a long journey with still no certain end immediately in sight
here's hoping you are not only correct but timely as well
icon url

oil-cowboy

08/27/08 2:40 PM

#138057 RE: oilphant #138038

Make it interesting at least??

1) Buyout

2) Buyin

3) Formation of consortium

icon url

midtieroil

08/27/08 3:52 PM

#138061 RE: oilphant #138038

Any type of buyout of ERHE prior to drilling is complete and utter folly. And the larger the acquirer, the bigger folly it would be. Offor would have to be a moron to accept a buyout now even if it were at $5. And who's going to pay 1000% premium over market?

If you have an Exxon or Chevron take over of ERHE at $5 any discovery in the JDZ no matter what the size would never increase their share price by more than 20% due to their size. That means Offor would end up getting the equivalent of $6 a share.

Let's say Addax did the takeover. I would say for Addax that no matter what the size of the discovery is in the JDZ, it would do no more than triple their price. So we are then talking about an upside of no more than $15 a share. And that's extremely optimistic.

With ERHE as a stand alone company I think the upside is $45 or more. It makes no sense for Offor or other ERHE shareholders to give up a least two thirds of their upside potential and probably a lot more. It would be foolish of him to do so and it ain't gonna happen when we are this close to drilling.

You've been making this same claim for years and the closer we get to drilling the more ridiculous it becomes. I give you an A for effort and persistence on this matter but an F in believability. Try to think it through a little before you make this ridiculous claim yet again. Perhaps all that chatter you keep hearing is an intentional attempt to deceive you. You seem to be falling for it but I don't think anyone else here is quite that naive.





icon url

Tamtam

08/27/08 4:19 PM

#138065 RE: oilphant #138038

Oh no, not again >>>>>>>



Tamtam