Yikes, I posted regarding this 'informative' report yesterday. Can anyone point out any substantive new information in this report? This is conjecture as evidenced by the use of so many conditional words, may, could, appear, etc.
Even the estimate of the number of global terrorists belies the headlines. The estimate of 18,000 is derived from an estimate of 20,000 trained in Afghanistan BEFORE we routed the Taliban, less 2,000 killed or wounded. In addition, I suppose some could have retired, found other careers, were born again, etc. But the report says the numbers swelled as a result of our war in Iraq, but gives no information supporting that. It doesn't seem unreasonable to conjecture such happening, but they offer nothing to support such conjecture. Actually, they should have said Al Qaeda may have way more than 18,000 trained terrorists, or les than that number, we're not real sure. Quite a think tank!