IN ESSENCE THEY DID PROVE THAT SHE WASN"T COVERT AND THAT SHE WAS OUTED
HOW COULD THEY "PROVE" IT W/O A TRIAL??? HOW EXACTLY COULD THEY HAVE PROVED IT BEFORE TRIAL? FITZ WAS DEAD SET ON HIS COURSE OF ACTION REGARDLESS? THERE WAS A DIFFERENCE AND UNDER OUR SYSTEM< THOSE ARE SETTLED IN COURT
FITZ HAD THE POWER TO INDICT AND HE USED IT EVEN THOUGH HE KNEW IT WAS ARMITAGE THAT OUTED HER
YOU VIEW FITZ AS THE WHITE KNIGHT IN THIS SCENARIO- TO ME IT"S OBVIOUS HE HAD POLITICAL MOTIVATION
WHAT"S MORE FRICKIN STUPID THAN HOLDING ON TO A BELIEF THAT WILL NEVER BE SHOWN TO BE TRUE